Risk / Threat vs. Risk Issue

October 26, 2009

risk_risk_issue_091026

***
Up front props:
1.    In the “risk universe” square, I used the “evolving change categorizations” from a Joshua Corman blog post found here.
2.    I heard the term “risk ecosystem” from Microsoft’s Mark Curphey in a video related to a risk repository web app they recently released called “Risk Tracker” (either here or here). I found the term to be valuable in the context of this blog post.
3.    The approach to the image above was not solely mine, I just embellished and sanitized on someone’s idea here at my employer.
***
Some terminology declarations:

I am using the word risk in a variety of capacities in this post.

In some cases, it is being used in the context of a threat (storm heading in my direction).

In other cases is being used in the context of a derived value; the probable magnitude and frequency of loss; $.

I am using the term “risk issue” or “risk finding” to mean a documented risk that requires a decision from management to either assume or mitigate.

Finally, in the database symbol titled “Risk Rep.” – that is short for “risk repository”.
***

I have recently been in a few conversations related to when a “risk” (or threat) becomes a “risk issue”. Most of these conversations have been with information security risk management executives; which implies “philosophying”, evangelizing, white boarding, and of course – excessive use of non-risk management analogies to reflect risk management concepts. In the end, these conversations turned out to be valuable because if forced the group to really understand when a risk (threat) becomes a risk issue in our environment. In other words, what are the various lenses we analyze threats or risk through to determine that we need to document a risk finding?

I will let you noodle the image and underlying concept on your own. However, below are a few parting points I would like to make.

1.    There is a difference between grandstanding on risks (threats) that pose no threat to your company versus managing risk issues within your own risk ecosystem. Think “solar storm heading directly to Mars” versus “a storm cell that is 10 miles away with 65 mile per hour winds headed directly towards us”.

2.    If a risk (threat) is important enough to grandstand on AND to begin mitigating – then it is no longer a risk, but a risk issue – and should be managed as such.

3.    Emerging risks – or threats – somewhat fall in between the two above. You may want to let management know about some potential exposure – but there is nothing that needs to be addressed today.

Feel free to share any thoughts you have!


Catching My Breath

October 22, 2009

Happy Birthday Mom!

My previous post was in early August (2009); a two post series on reputation risk. Since then, my professional and personal life has been pretty busy. Here is a quick update that will hopefully set some context for some upcoming (and hopefully more meaningful) posts between now and the end of the year.

No More PCI. OK, not 100% true – but let me explain. From about June 2008 until September 2009 – I helped lead a large information technology program (enterprise level program; containing numerous projects) to enhance some payment transaction applications as well as better manage compliance with the PCI DSS standard. Helping lead this program was truly one of the highlights of my information security / risk management career. It is not often in a big company that you get to be dedicated to a program for so long – as well as get to dive so deep to ensure that the solution being developed is not only compliant –but also secure. I transitioned away from the PCI program in early September to help lead some information risk management capability projects. I am still doing some ad-hoc / historical knowledge PCI consulting here and there – but for the most, I am not focused on PCI – and I am enjoying it.

So what am I doing now?

There are three efforts I am primarily working on.

Risk Quantification Methodology. Around April / May of 2008, I wrote a small proposal to our security leadership about transitioning from qualitative risk assessments to quantitative risk assessments. In late Q3 of 2008 – I was given the green light to lead a proof of concept of what I proposed earlier in 2008 – in my “spare time” when not dealing with PCI stuff. The proof of concept extended into early 2009. In late Q1 2009, I presented the POC findings to security leadership and shortly thereafter, a decision was made to transition to quantitative risk assessments. Since I was still primarily working on the PCI-related program – the risk quantification strategy was put on hold. Fast forward to September and now I have time to implement the risk quantification methodology and all the goodness that come with it (training, process changes, reporting, awareness, oversight, etc…). The goal is to have the methodology implemented in 2009 and focus on the related deliverables of reporting and oversight in 2010.

Risk Optimization Decision Model. This is really exciting and also dates back to Q4 of 2008. Very high level – I am working with a wicked smart data modeler to help build what I will refer to as a risk optimization model. The main purpose of the model is to aid decision making for information security (risk-related) funding decisions. An example of its use could be: A company has a lot of risk associated with “external fraud” and “internal fraud”; for example access control / authorization. The company has a loss model serving as a baseline. The company wants to invest $x dollars in a mitigation control that it expects to reduce loss frequency for “internal fraud” by 2% and “external fraud” by 10%. Based off the expected loss frequency reduction – what is the difference between the baseline loss model and the new loss model? Is there a risk reduction? If so, is the cost of the mitigation control a sound investment based of the risk reduction? I think there will be some interesting posts coming up related to this effort.

Risk Alignment. Around April of 2009, I was asked to represent the information risk management group (job family at my employer) in a working group with other risk assessment groups in our enterprise (Internal Audits, Financial Reporting Controls, SEC / FINRA, Privacy and Legal). I consider it a huge privilege and an even bigger growth opportunity. We have all heard of integrated operational risk management – and this working group is the epitome of that. Since my involvement with this working group, I have learned so much more about the company I work for as well as how other risk assessment programs assess and manage risk. The goal is alignment across risk assessment programs. Does that mean that every program assesses and manages exactly the same way – of course not. But there are opportunities to align on vernacular, risk concepts, risk categories, and in some cases risk repositories. I anticipate publishing a few blog posts that have been heavily influenced by my involvement with this alignment working group.

Finally, below are some books I have read since I took my vacation in late July. These books have nothing to do with IT or Information Security Risk Management whatsoever.

Crossfire by Andy McNab – Body guarding a TV crew on the streets of war-torn Basra, ex-deniable operator Nick Stone’s life is saved by a reporter’s swift action as a roadside bomb explodes. When the man later vanishes, Stone is asked to find him. The trail leads from Iraq to Bermuda, London and Kabul, the dark and brutal city where governments, terrorism and big business inexorably collide. Caught in the crossfire, his nightmare is only just beginning, for the hunter has suddenly become the hunted. . .

Brute Force by Andy McNab – Days after his car erupts in a ball of flame, Nick Stone narrowly cheats death a second time when a gunman opens fire on him from the back of a motorcycle. Who knows his movements? Who wants him dead, and why? Stone’s only chance of survival is to carry the fight to his attackers – but first he must uncover a trail of clues that leads from his own dark and complex past into the heart of a chilling conspiracy that threatens us all…Nick Stone’s eleventh adventure is McNab at his explosive best.

The Last Templar by Raymond Khoury – The war between the Catholic Church and the Gnostic insurgency drags on in this ponderous Da Vinci Code knockoff. The latest skirmish erupts when horsemen dressed as knights raid New York’s Metropolitan Museum of Art, lopping off heads and firing Uzis as they go. Their trail leads FBI agent Sean Ryan and fetching archeologist Tess Chaykin to the medieval crusading order of the Knights Templars. Anachronistic Gnostic champions of feminism and tolerance against Roman hierarchy and obscurantism, the Templars, they learn, discovered proof that Catholic dogma is a “hoax” and were planning to use it to unite all religions under a rationalist creed that would usher in world peace.

Moscow Rules by Daniel Silva – The death of a journalist leads Israeli spy Gabriel Allon to Russia, where he finds that, in terms of spycraft, even he has something to learn if he wants to prevent a former KGB colonel from delivering Russia’s most sophisticated weapons to al-Qaeda.

The Defector by Daniel Silva – Six months after the dramatic conclusion of Moscow Rules, Gabriel has returned to the tan hills of Umbria to resume his honeymoon with his new wife, Chiara, and restore a seventeenth-century altarpiece for the Vatican. But his idyllic world is once again thrown into turmoil with shocking news from London. The defector and former Russian intelligence officer Grigori Bulganov, who saved Gabriel’s life in Moscow, has vanished without a trace. British intelligence is sure he was a double agent all along, but Gabriel knows better. He also knows he made a promise. “If an injury has to be done to a man it should be so severe that his vengeance need not be feared.”